Planting evidence wasn't so easy

["Eli Stephens" <elishastephens@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I wrote some time ago I thought that the US would have a hard time planting
chemical or biological (or nuclear, for that matter) weapons in Iraq that
would
be convincing. Yet further evidence of that prediction today, in a Reuters
story:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration has changed its tune on
Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, the reason it went to war there. Instead
of
looking for vast stocks of banned materials, it is now pinning its hopes on
finding
documentary evidence.

Full:
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/politics/politics-iraq-usa-weapons.html?ex=1053930535&ei=1&en=17ee6e779c2ebf4f

Planting documents - now that's something they can (and will) do rather
easily. And, as an abundance of evidence tells us, something that won't get
much scrutiny from the "liberal" press (on the latter point, be SURE to see
the latest Tom Tomorrow cartoon):
http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=14977

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail