Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Anglo-American Brutality



A vivid reminder of the heights to which Anglo-American brutality can
reach, taken from WWII. I'm posting the entire article because an extensive
and intrusive registration process is otherwise required to read it online
at the LA Times, where it appeared. The author is writing, to a certain
extent, to excuse the current civilian deaths in Iraq as a "failure", an
accident. Of course these deaths are no accident. The bombs didn't find
their way from factories in Texas to marketplaces in Bagdhad by Brownian
motion. Perhaps civilians were deliberately targeted, perhaps not. But with
the known accuracy of weapons (with missiles having landed in three
incorrect COUNTRIES already in this war!), launching 1000 missiles or
bombs GUARANTEES that 1 or 10 or 100 or whatever the "failure" rate is
will fall on "non-intended" targets. It is a mathematical certainty, and, as
a result, no "accident." Nevertheless the information in this article is
well
worth the read.

-----------

Los Angeles Times, 3/28/03:

Beyond Slaughter: Memories of '45
The bombing of Baghdad cannot be compared to the Allies' incineration of
German cities in WWII.

OPINION
 
By Jorg Friedrich, Special to The Times

At high noon on March 12, 1945, just eight weeks before the capitulation of
Germany to the Allied forces, 1,000 American planes attacked the city of
Swinemuende on the Baltic coast of Germany. The city, crammed with refugees
from eastern Germany who had been ethnically cleansed and systematically
raped by the Red Army, was bombed mercilessly and sprayed by machine gun
fire from American dive bombers, which chased people through the city.

Of the city's 25,000 civilians, 23,000 were killed that night.

A similar fate befell the city of Wurzburg just four days later, when 225
Lancaster bombers dispatched by British bomber command dropped 1,100 tons of
bombs. The city -- a bishop's seat in southern Germany, one of the jewels of
European rococo style -- was destroyed by flames in 17 minutes. Although the
end of the war was imminent, 6,000 civilians were killed that night.

This was more than "shock and awe": This was the final months of the
relentless, five-year Allied bombing campaign that took civilian deaths to
their apex -- bombing, burning, incinerating the cities of Germany in a
round-the-clock effort to destroy morale, foment insurrection and weaken the
industrial heart and soul of Adolf Hitler's war machine.

This was no Iraq. Despite comparisons made in recent days between the
bombing of German cities and the "shock and awe" bombing of Baghdad, this
was actually the opposite. Instead of seeking to avoid civilian casualties
as they are doing today, the Americans and British in the 1940s sought to
maximize them.

Forty-five thousand people were killed in Hamburg during the air attacks;
50,000 in Dresden, 12,000 in Berlin, 10,000 in Kassel, 5,500 in Frankfurt
and so on. In Pforzheim, a city of 63,000, one-third of the population was
incinerated in one night in February 1945, even as the war was coming to a
close.

Night after night after night, entire cities were lighted on fire, like a
nonnuclear version of Hiroshima or Nagasaki.

Never before in modern history had a civilian population endured such a
military assault. One and a half million bombs were dropped on 161 German
cities and 800 villages over five years, leaving half a million civilians
dead, including 75,000 children. An additional 78,000 of Hitler's slave
workers and prisoners of war were killed.

No one was ever punished for these acts. The winners, not surprisingly,
didn't indict themselves for war crimes.

And, in fact, there was nothing technically illegal about their actions.

According to Telford Taylor, the chief U.S. prosecutor of the Nuremberg
trials, there was no international agreement limiting aerial bombardment to
military targets -- so, technically, the bombing was legal.

Nevertheless, it was unprecedented and beyond any of the customs of war. The
war itself was just, but the means by which it was conducted were unjust and
unimaginable.

And worst of all, the bombing was an unmitigated failure. It simply didn't
work. It weakened Hitler but didn't lead to his overthrow. It didn't destroy
morale or incite rebellion; 75,000 children killed and it didn't do anything
except, perhaps, strengthen the resolve of the German people against the
Allies.

For years afterward, Germans didn't mention these things. We lost the war,
and rightly so. Now we were making peace with the world, and it seemed
wrong, somehow, to speak about the wounds that had been inflicted on us by
countries that were now our allies, our protectors.

In the years that followed, none of the numerous British and American
historians of the bombing campaign fairly described the tragedy of mass
destruction and massacre wreaked on the German cities. Even German
historians who knew better didn't dare to describe the devastation unleashed
by the Allies.

At a press conference last week, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld noted
comparisons had been made between the current campaign and the bombings in
Germany. It's a laughable comparison.

You cannot compare the mass destruction of incendiary warfare -- aimed at
killing civilians in extraordinary numbers -- with the noisy but relatively
precise and targeted attacks on Baghdad. Such comparisons are far too kind
to Arthur "Bomber" Harris, the British leader of the Allied air campaign.

The difference is this: In Baghdad today, civilian deaths constitute
failure; in WWII Germany, they meant success. The U.S. would be a pariah in
world opinion today if it targeted even one Iraqi city the way it attacked
German cities relentlessly for five years.

A better comparison is to Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. If
the Iraqi leader were to use chemical or biological weapons -- which strike
civilian and military targets indiscriminately over a large territory --
that would be comparable. Then Hussein would be the true heir of "Bomber"
Harris.

Jorg Friedrich, a military historian, is author of "Der Brand" ("The Fire"),
a history of the Allied air campaign against Germany during World War II.






_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail




Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]