Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: Special Forces or Special
I don't mean to be tiresome, and it wasn't all THAT big an issue, but the
Russian report didn't simply interchange "forces" with "Group." It gave them a
specific unit designation, 1st, 3rd, 5th, 10th... and Special Forces is
organized into these "Groups"... eg, my old units were 7th SFGA and 3rd SFGA,
that is, Special Forces Group (Airborne).
Really didn't mean to get anyone wrapped arond an axle.
~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
- Thread context:
- What Supporting Our Troops really means...,
Will Miller Thu 27 Mar 2003, 16:42 GMT
- War and the color line,
Louis Proyect Thu 27 Mar 2003, 16:30 GMT
- Global sentiment against the US war,
Louis Proyect Thu 27 Mar 2003, 14:32 GMT
- Re: Special Forces or Special,
Charles Jannuzi Thu 27 Mar 2003, 14:32 GMT
- Autonomism: evading power,
Louis Proyect Thu 27 Mar 2003, 14:11 GMT
- Re: war,
Louis Proyect Thu 27 Mar 2003, 14:04 GMT
- Michael Kidron,
Louis Proyect Thu 27 Mar 2003, 13:40 GMT
- Biting the hand that feeds (and kills) you,
Louis Proyect Thu 27 Mar 2003, 13:33 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]