Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re:Gramscian analysis of u.s.
I reviewed that stuff for my dissertation, but could not find anything
"very" useful. Gramscian analysis has been used to analyze
non-material/non-class sources of power, such as culture, civil society,
social movements etc. Some of the Gramscians are international relations
theorists. Robert Cox and Stephen Gill have applied Gramscian concepts and
framework to U.S. hegemony. Take a look at Gill's _American Hegemony and
Trileteral Commission_ .
The best thing is to go with standard marxist analysis of hegemony. See
Petras, Gowan, Mandel, Wallerstein, Arrighhi, etc.
Pijl's _The Making of an Atlantic Ruling Class_ is good too..
Gowan's _Global Gamble_ is one of the best..
**************************************************
Xxxx A. Xxxxxx
Ph.D Candidate, ABD
Department of Political Science
Nelson A. Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy
University at Albany, S.U.N.Y.
135 Western Avenue, Milne Hall
Albany, NY 12222
xxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx
***************************************************
"Frequently the only possible answer is a critique of the
question and the only solution is to negate the question."
Grundrisse, "The Chapter on Money,"
****************************************************
~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
- Thread context:
- [no subject],
Fred Feldman Sat 01 Mar 2003, 22:18 GMT
- gramscian analysis of u.s.,
Mike Friedman Sat 01 Mar 2003, 21:57 GMT
- Behind Turkey's opposition to war,
Louis Proyect Sat 01 Mar 2003, 21:49 GMT
- RE: Replacing _The Nation_ ? was: Re: The Nation Magazine's tain ted liberalism,
Craven, Jim Sat 01 Mar 2003, 21:28 GMT
- Re: Ramos Horta,
John Edmundson Sat 01 Mar 2003, 20:53 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]