Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Blair
Phil wrote:
Alternately, they could end up dumping Blair before the next election
and replacing him with some equally New Labour type not publicly seen to
be as compromised by a love-in with Bush.
Absolutely. The rats always seem to have more maneuvering room than we
think. But my hope is that Blair's present position is truly terminal and
that disgrace in the foreign arena will spill over into domestic
issues. Do New Labour have a replacement for Blair? Brown I suppose.
regards
Gary
~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
- Thread context:
- UK state: no official opposition to New Labour,
Michael Keaney Thu 20 Feb 2003, 10:31 GMT
- US imperialism: Latin America says no to Iraq war,
Michael Keaney Thu 20 Feb 2003, 10:21 GMT
- Re: "Mr Aznar, send your own sons" [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK],
David Quarter Thu 20 Feb 2003, 09:34 GMT
- Re: Blair,
Philip Ferguson Thu 20 Feb 2003, 05:36 GMT
- Re: Blair,
Gary MacLennan Thu 20 Feb 2003, 07:03 GMT
- Re: Blair,
David Quarter Thu 20 Feb 2003, 07:28 GMT
- RE: Blair,
Paddy Apling Thu 20 Feb 2003, 20:26 GMT
- * RE: Argentina, Iraq (Spanish with a note for Anglophones),
Juan Fajardo Thu 20 Feb 2003, 05:15 GMT
- What's new at Marxist Interventions,
Tom O'Lincoln Thu 20 Feb 2003, 05:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]