Re: Antiwar diversity

[Adam Levenstein <cleon42@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- loupaulsen@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> This is actually not a bad article at all, except for the orientation
>
> toward "breaking ANSWER's monopoly", as if people are sitting around
> the
> ANSWER offices grousing and complaining about how millions of people
> are doing
> stuff and ANSWER isn't the only game in town.

I agree--neither ANSWER, the IAC, or WWP has said anything of the sort.
They haven't claimed (or even hinted) that they are the One True
Anti-War movement, unlike some other formations.

In fact, in a recent issue of Workers World they had a rundown of
various events, ANSWER-sponsored and non-ANSWER sponsored.

That sort of characterization--that ANSWER, IAC, or WWP is trying to
dominate the movement somehow--is grossly unfair to all the players
involved.


=====
-----------------------------------------------------------
Adam Levenstein                          cleon42@xxxxxxxxx
ICQ: 17125158

Microsoft will make something that doesn't suck when
they start manufacturing vacuum cleaners.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.