Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
united for peace vs. ANSWER
[ converted from html ]
United for Peace vs. ANSWER
Can anyone clarify the relationship between these two organizations?
Are they excluding each other as they compete with each other? Is
there any other --in addition to being anti-stalinist-- political reason
for developing two parallel anti-war organizations?
--
Frequently the only possible answer is a critique of the
question and the only solution is to negate the question.
Karl Marx, 1857, Grundrisse, "The Chapter on Money," p.127.
E. Ahmet Tonak
Professor of Economics
Simon's Rock College of Bard
84 Alford Road
Great Barrington, MA 01230
Tel: 413 528 7488
Fax: 413 528 7365
www.simons-rock.edu/~eatonak
~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
- Thread context:
- Laser Weapons Alert - new weapons - call to stop the war machine,
Bob Anderson Thu 12 Dec 2002, 19:41 GMT
- Torquemadas in Birkenstocks,
Louis Proyect Thu 12 Dec 2002, 19:32 GMT
- re; for all the lovers of music & freedom,
John O'Neill Thu 12 Dec 2002, 18:31 GMT
- Re: United for Peace and ANSWER,
loupaulsen Thu 12 Dec 2002, 18:23 GMT
- united for peace vs. ANSWER,
e. ahmet tonak Thu 12 Dec 2002, 18:00 GMT
- (fwd from James Daly) Re: Did Stalinism end in the 1950s?,
Les Schaffer Thu 12 Dec 2002, 17:58 GMT
- (fwd from Ben Chabot) dialectics,
Les Schaffer Thu 12 Dec 2002, 17:53 GMT
- SWP respond to the SSP letter,
Nigel Irritable Thu 12 Dec 2002, 17:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]