Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO
From: "T.Hartin" <t.hartin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Actually if you bothered to even glance over the document (and not just
> its final few paragraphs) you would know that the differences Socialist
> Alternative identified had nothing to do with State Capitalism.
There are actually two documents, of course.
The "two competing organisations with fundamentally the same politics" bit
is from the more recent one. That is what Ben and I were referring to.
As for the Socialist Alliance being electoralist: it would, in fact, be a
waste of time if it was only an electoral pact. Socialist Alternative would
be correct in not being part of it. But, of course, it isn't just an
electoral pact.
Alan Bradley
abradley1@xxxxxxxxxxx
~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
- Thread context:
- Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO, (continued)
- Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO,
benj Tue 22 Oct 2002, 02:51 GMT
- Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO,
Alan Bradley Tue 22 Oct 2002, 06:02 GMT
- Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO,
T.Hartin Tue 22 Oct 2002, 13:12 GMT
- Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO,
Alan Bradley Tue 22 Oct 2002, 14:38 GMT
- Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO,
T.Hartin Wed 23 Oct 2002, 09:10 GMT
- Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO,
Shane Hopkinson Wed 23 Oct 2002, 10:36 GMT
- Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO,
NIBS Wed 23 Oct 2002, 12:34 GMT
- Re: Socialist alternative 'unity' offer to ISO,
benj Fri 25 Oct 2002, 03:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]