Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
re: Labour parties
Bob Gould writes:
> Phil Ferguson views things from a
> standpoint that I described as principled sectarianism,
Yeh, you said that a few weeks back. But then, a little while later,
didn't you suggest I might be right about the NZ Labour Party?
My *suspicion* is that the DSP is right about the Aussie LP and that the
SP and others are right about Blair's party. But the only LP I am
prepared to claim to be an expert on is the NZ beast. It is certainly a
bourgeois-liberal party these days. Even genuine social democrats in NZ
- eg the Alliance - probably regard it in this way. The Alliance people
I know (and I know a fair few) don't seem to regard Labour as any kind
of workers' party any longer.
Phil
~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
- Thread context:
- Labour parties,
Steve Painter and Rose McCann Fri 18 Oct 2002, 02:34 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Labour parties,
Steve Painter and Rose McCann Fri 18 Oct 2002, 03:59 GMT
- Labour parties,
Steve Painter and Rose McCann Fri 18 Oct 2002, 04:02 GMT
- re: Labour parties,
Philip Ferguson Fri 18 Oct 2002, 04:27 GMT
- Labour Parties,
Jurriaan Bendien Fri 18 Oct 2002, 10:35 GMT
- Labour Parties,
Jurriaan Bendien Fri 18 Oct 2002, 12:21 GMT
- re: Labour Parties,
benj Fri 18 Oct 2002, 16:35 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]