Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Clancy Sigal attacks Camejo



(The Camejo campaign is beginning to get the same kind of negative attention that the Nader campaign for president got in 2000, which is a sign that it is making headway. Clancy Sigal is the author of "Going Away", a 'roman a clef' revolving around his discussions with fellow CP'ers in the 1950s, who have become disillusioned by the suppression of the revolt in Hungary, the Khrushchev revelations, etc. He was a black-listed screenwriter who eventually made his way to England, where he hooked up with Doris Lessing, another CP'er and author. In her "Golden Notebook", Sigal (Saul Green) is an important character. He comes across as a total scumbag. In a June 17, 1989 Guardian piece, written on the occasion of his return to the USA from England, Sigal admits, "In the Sixties, I changed from being John Reed, the US radical journalist, to Colonel Blimp." Yeah, I guess so.)


NY Times, Oct. 17, 2002

NOTES FROM LOS ANGELES
A Gray Future for California Voters
By CLANCY SIGAL

LOS ANGELES ? My liberal friends insist that my soul is doomed to eternal damnation because I worked for Ralph Nader in the 2000 election that threw the presidency to George W. Bush. They're probably right. There are nights when the Devil's pitchfork keeps me awake because I, having reached for the third-party lever, made John Ashcroft our top law officer and war with Iraq a religious crusade.

I'd like a rest from sleep-destroying guilt. But the midterm elections are upon us and I am a Californian.

The governor's race here is between two majestically unappealing candidates: the incumbent, Gray Davis, and his doltish Republican opponent, Bill Simon Jr. Combined, they make a towering argument for any third party.

Mr. Davis, a liberal authoritarian, is hugely unpopular because he mishandled California's energy crisis and is more brazenly on the take for campaign funds ? $50 million and counting, a new national record ? than a Capone-era Chicago alderman. He is like one of those old carnival speak-your-weight machines that won't cough up unless you put money in it.

Mr. Davis, who has presidential ambitions, masterminded a brilliant campaign in the June primary by using attack ads to defeat the best Republican candidate, Richard Riordan, formerly mayor of Los Angeles, thus ensuring the Republicans' selection of a weak right-winger, namely Mr. Simon.

I don't know anybody, aside from a few compromised pols and Hollywood celebrities, who will vote for Mr. Davis without holding his or her nose. Mr. Davis's support for the death penalty is bad enough, but he has overruled his own, appointed parole board at least 80 times, regardless of circumstances, in refusing their recommendations to release convicted murderers.

And yet: despite a lifelong habit of supporting alternative parties, I will vote for Mr. Davis, too. There is a difference between Mr. Davis and Mr. Simon. The difference is sometimes microscopic, but sometimes significant. A stroke of the governor's pen can affect a lot of lives.

The Green Party candidate for governor in California, Peter Camejo, an investment adviser, is both attractive and uncrazy. He leads a party of 147,000 registered Greens and probably many more sympathizers. He could swing a close election if the Greens could be mobilized to vote ? which many of them refuse to do because they are disgusted by the present two-party system.

Mr. Camejo is devoted to more than just traditional Green causes like preserving California's old-growth forests. He has called for a statewide minimum wage of $10.50, a ban on the death penalty, legalization of gay marriage and loans to homeowners to install solar energy.

Yet despite his instinct for outreach, Mr. Camejo falls into the Green habit of marginalization. He wasted time on the campaign trail attacking Senator Barbara Boxer and Representative Barbara Lee for being too soft in criticizing the war on terror, even though they have been among the war's few opponents in Congress. "You can't solve problems gradually and peacefully," Mr. Camejo said this spring. "You have to make it an explosion." This is poor politics as well as poor word choice.

full: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/17/opinion/17SIGA.html


Louis Proyect
www.marxmail.org


~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]