Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Labour parties
At 22/09/2002 13:32, Lou wrote:
I honestly think that Bob wants the left to dump a lot of useless baggage,
but he needs to include this tendency toward ideological reductionism.
Specifically, to group Phil Ferguson's magazine with Daniel DeLeon, the
dregs of the Healyite movement, the Sparts, etc. is just absurd. For one
thing, Revolution magazine is simply not in the business of recruiting
people to some kind of vanguard that will liberate New Zealand. Anybody
who reads it can figure that out for themselves. It is a lot more like
Marxmail, with distinct standpoints within Marxism liberally interpreted.
I write for it, as does James Heartfield who is associated with Frank
Furedi's network. You really can't get more far apart than me and Heartfield.
They never asked me to write for it yet, so it's not so inclusive as I'd
like it to be. I rather like and respect Phil Ferguson so I'm waiting the
call here...
Mark
~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
- Thread context:
- Labour parties, (continued)
- Labour parties,
Steve Painter and Rose McCann Sat 21 Sep 2002, 15:28 GMT
- Labour parties,
Steve Painter and Rose McCann Sat 21 Sep 2002, 23:59 GMT
- A correction,
Philip Ferguson Fri 20 Sep 2002, 03:17 GMT
- Reference Center for Marxist Studies,
lause Fri 20 Sep 2002, 02:44 GMT
- Fwd: Carnegie Dream scenario: Military occupation w/o regime change,
Jacob Levich Fri 20 Sep 2002, 00:36 GMT
- Forwarded from Paul Buhle (Rod Serling),
Louis Proyect Thu 19 Sep 2002, 20:35 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]