Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist

To: marxmail <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist
From: Ed George <edgeorge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 23:30:07 +0200

What shockingly awful, self-serving stuff this is! (But fascinating -
thanks Louis.) I'll come back to this subject when time permits but
here's some more background on the man from last weekend's (UK)
Guardian.

<http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,791516,00.html>

~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist
  - From: Mark Jones

Prev by Date: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist
Next by Date: Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist
Previous by thread: Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist
Next by thread: Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Forwarded from George Snedeker, Louis Proyect Wed 18 Sep 2002, 23:50 GMT
- Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist, Louis Proyect Wed 18 Sep 2002, 20:56 GMT
  - Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist, Mark Jones Wed 18 Sep 2002, 22:03 GMT
    - Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist, Gary Maclennan Thu 19 Sep 2002, 04:02 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist, Ed George Wed 18 Sep 2002, 21:45 GMT
    - Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist, Mark Jones Wed 18 Sep 2002, 22:24 GMT
  - Re: Why Hobsbawm remained a Communist, Jim Farmelant Wed 18 Sep 2002, 22:39 GMT
- Stratfor on Possible Russia/USA Deal, Paul Flewers Wed 18 Sep 2002, 20:44 GMT
  - Re: Stratfor on Possible Russia/USA Deal, Mark Jones Wed 18 Sep 2002, 22:46 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]