Re: excuse me?

[lause@xxxxxxx]

Once again, an intense bloody arguments about terms.
Just like the anarchism/socialism/communism nexis.
Perhaps this is the postmodernist influence?  Of
course, terms change meaning all the time, depending on
the user.  Can we discussr the substance not the
terminology?  If there's agreement on that, let's
bracket the quibbling over terms.

Are there self described socialists who are
reactionary?  Yes!  Will I jump to their defense
because they call themselves socialists?  Not unless
I'm very, very bored and have nothing better to do.
So, why should people be touching about acknowleding
the realities as opposed to the rhetoric?

Solidarity!
Mark


~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.