Re: bourgeois tasks/stages

To: <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bourgeois tasks/stages
From: "bon moun" <sherrynstan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 10:12:38 -0400

>So that means I support permanent
> revolution? or is there more to it?

I support the local struggle by Black parents, students, and teachers
against a white-dominated school board. It may not be the permanent
revolution, but these pedestrian little issues sure seem to consume a lot
of time. Maybe I should explain to these folks about the permanent
revolution, and the archaic controversy over the two-stage theory.

~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.

References:
- bourgeois tasks/stages
  - From: Shane Hopkinson

Prev by Date: Re: Re: bourgeois tasks/stages
Next by Date: Re: bourgeois tasks/stages
Previous by thread: Re: bourgeois tasks/stages
Next by thread: Re: Re: bourgeois tasks/stages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Two Stage Vs Permanent Revolution Questions, D OC Fri 26 Jul 2002, 16:21 GMT
- Forwarded from Walter Lippmann, Louis Proyect Fri 26 Jul 2002, 16:13 GMT
- bourgeois tasks/stages, Shane Hopkinson Fri 26 Jul 2002, 12:34 GMT
  - Re: bourgeois tasks/stages, Martin Schreader Fri 26 Jul 2002, 13:26 GMT
  - Re: bourgeois tasks/stages, bon moun Fri 26 Jul 2002, 14:33 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Re: bourgeois tasks/stages, Ed George Fri 26 Jul 2002, 13:55 GMT
    - Re: bourgeois tasks/stages, Martin Schreader Fri 26 Jul 2002, 14:49 GMT
      
      Moderator's note, Louis Proyect Fri 26 Jul 2002, 15:06 GMT
      
      Re: Moderator's note, Macdonald Stainsby Fri 26 Jul 2002, 21:07 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]