Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

New books on the Cuban Revolution



Los Angeles Times
Sunday, July 21, 2002

COVER REVIEW
The Cuban Conundrum

By LOUIS A. PÉREZ JR.

INSIDE THE CUBAN REVOLUTION
Fidel Castro and the Urban Underground
By Julia E. Sweig
Harvard University Press: 254 pp., $29.95

THE CUBAN REVOLUTION AND THE UNITED STATES
A History in Documents, 1958-1960
Edited by Mark Falcoff
U.S. Cuba Press: 452 pp., $32

After more than 40 years of confrontation with the United States, Fidel Castro remains in power, defiant and determined to outlast one more hostile administration in Washington. Ten years after the collapse of socialism in Eastern Europe, at a time when the United States projects power across the globe virtually uncontested, the Cuban government, a mere 90 miles away, amends its constitution to proclaim the inalterable character of socialism on the island. The resolve and resilience of Cuba's leaders in the face of decades of unrelenting pressure from Washington remains a source of perplexity and pain to U.S. policymakers.

Debate and dispute, of course, have long characterized the U.S. response to Castro's Cuba. In the Cuban revolution, one comes face to face, at one time and in one place, with issues of enduring vitality and moment: power and powerlessness, dictatorship and democracy, nationalism and imperialism, the quest for social justice and the economic imperative. These issues prompt, on every side, vigorous partisanship. Detachment and disinterest are almost impossible.

Cuban history is similarly implicated, of course, and especially those facets of the Cuban past that bear most directly on the present. One such debate involves Castro's 26th of July movement (named for the date in 1953 that saw his ill-fated attack against a military barrack) and the armed insurrection against the government of president-turned dictator Fulgencio Batista.

The debate is over which of the two components of the 26th of July movement--the civilians who fought in the urban underground, or llano, or the soldiers who made up the guerrilla columns in the mountains, or sierra--played the more decisive role in toppling Batista.

It is a debate that is at the heart of the complicated social and class composition of the broad-based opposition to Batista. Understanding this debate helps to illuminate the purpose to which power was put after the 1959 ouster of Batista. As Julia E. Sweig makes clear in "Inside the Cuban Revolution," the llano was made up principally of middle-class professionals seeking to restore civil liberties and free elections guaranteed by Cuba's 1940 constitution. The sierra, on the other hand, represented by Castro, was composed of peasants and workers and sought a thorough-going egalitarianism based on social justice. The sierra prevailed, and many of the llano fled into exile, claiming that the revolution had been betrayed and that a liberal democratic program, rooted in a return to law, had been subverted by a radical socialist whose principal objective was his own power.

full: http://www.calendarlive.com/top/1,1419,L-LATimes-Books-X!ArticleDetail-66531,00.html

--

Louis Proyect
www.marxmail.org



~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]