Re.: Beijing backs Nepal govt against Maoist guerrillas

[Chris Brady <cdbrady@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Whenever I read these sorts of reports I ask myself why such monster
states as India, USA and China would invest huge funds in propping up a
government such as that in Nepal--instead of granting the impoverished
Nepalese people the same investment amounts in social spending, thus
staving off rebellions?
The same could go for Colombia.  But here is the crux, non?  If the
imperialists ploughed back their profits as investments to benefit
humanity instead of more profit then they would be instituting a system
that contradicts the primacy of profit.  One might arrive at the
conclusion that strife actually benefits capital, no matter how much the
capitalists claim to support stabilization.  Dynamic capital cannot be
stabilized or it would cease to be what it is.  Strife becomes the
essence of capital (alla the Italian Futurists' aesthetic of speed,
power and war).
Anyways, the Maoists in Nepal seem to be up against it.


~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.