Re: Dialectics/Ouestion

[JOEFREEMEN@xxxxxxx]

Sir, without offending your sensibility, have I not put forth the most
advanced Marxist proposition available in the communist movement? First this
stage in the social movement and the development of polarity was pinpointed.
Instead of analysis I am given criticism for being in the image of Stalin. I
criticized no one for being in any image bit specific political projects.

Sir, in part two of Dialectics I should how materialist dilaectic is applied
and define the refom movemenet in capital. You have not read this yet. In
part 3, which will be ready tomorrow I give a qualitative description to the
polarization with in the the working class, raise the question of its impact
upon the organic composition of capital and have in the past use reprinted
passages from Marc and called a Stalinist - which I love, and told that my
formualtion are Stalin's when I quote the exact text in Marx from which they
come.

In frustration I rebel and because a person with a graps of dialectic would
put forward a qualitative description of imperialism today. I did that. Let
us assume I am wrong. No one else has put forth a qualitative description of
imperialism in simply terms that even come close to the elementary fact I
articulate.

Allow me the honor of being defeated on the level of theory.

Joe
Genuinely Comradely.

One third of my would was in dclose league with Trokyited in the
International Socialist before they desolved. To be eact Local 51  UAW

~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.