Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Response to Brian Cahill
Clip all extraneous text before replying to a message or risk suspension
=======
At 02:13 AM 10/15/2001, Donal wrote:
>There can be no meaningful unity with Fascists - which
>is what Loyalists are. Ordinary working-class Protestants
Yes, Loyalists are fascists, but as for ordinary working class Protestants,
the IRSP and the INLA have always had members who came from that
background, so it is possible to reach them through socialist politics.
>We are doing what we can in Stormont and it takes every
>waking hour to do just that.
The problem with SF is that the left wing of the party has largely been
pushed into a closet while the more conservative elements hold the
reins. McGuinness, for example, has never struck me as being particularly
left or indeed even particularly political.
>If the SP representative cannot construct an argument without
>resorting to exaggeration and cant, please don't respond to me
Mr. Cahill is long known as anti-Republican and anti-Republican Socialist,
i.e. a typical Irish socialist.
Danielle Ni Dhighe
Puget Sound Chapter, Irish Republican Socialist Committees of North America
nidhighe@xxxxxxxx - http://www.irsm.org/irscna/
"I owe my allegiance to the working class." - Seamus Costello
- Thread context:
- Re: Third way question, (continued)
- Magellan,
Donal Mon 15 Oct 2001, 10:24 GMT
- Response to Brian Cahill,
Donal Mon 15 Oct 2001, 09:30 GMT
- Re: Irish republicans,
Philip Ferguson Mon 15 Oct 2001, 05:56 GMT
- Re: Malvinas and Militant,
Xxxx Xxxxxx Mon 15 Oct 2001, 04:11 GMT
- Re: Malvinas,
Xxxx Xxxxxx Mon 15 Oct 2001, 04:11 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]