Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: dependent socialism?
- Subject: RE: dependent socialism?
- From: "Austin, Andrew" <austina@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 19:54:46 -0700
Considering that the Soviet Union's relations with its satellites were
anti-imperialistic (in the capitalist sense) the idea of a "dependent
socialism" seems a bit silly.
Andrew Austin
Assistant Professor
Social Change and Development
University of Wisconsin-Green Bay
Green Bay, WI 54311-7001
(920) 465-2791
Webpage: http://www.uwgb.edu/austina
-----Original Message-----
From: George Snedeker [mailto:snedeker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 10:02 PM
To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: dependent socialism?
What is surprising is that Marxists have yet to come out with a theory of
dependent socialism. Its time we did it, so as to have a truly global
worldview.
DEPENDENT SOCIALISM? is dependent socialism "socialism"? is it really
capitalism? i'm not sure I understand the question...
- Thread context:
- A tribute to Ann Proyect,
Louis Proyect Sun 27 May 2001, 20:35 GMT
- What the U.S. media won't tell you-Powell's visit to S.A.,
Salim Vally Sun 27 May 2001, 09:12 GMT
- dependent socialism?,
George Snedeker Sun 27 May 2001, 02:45 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: dependent socialism?,
Austin, Andrew Sun 27 May 2001, 02:54 GMT
- Re: dependent socialism?,
Juan R. Fajardo Sun 27 May 2001, 14:57 GMT
- Re: dependent socialism?,
Xxxx Xxxxxx Sun 27 May 2001, 15:43 GMT
- RE: dependent socialism?,
Austin, Andrew Sun 27 May 2001, 16:50 GMT
- Re: dependent socialism?,
Jose G. Perez Mon 28 May 2001, 02:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]