Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Calculus
> For someone who is starting out in arithmetic, they can add zero,
> subtract zero,
zero is the identity element in addition operation: n + 0 =
n. subtraction is the inverse operation to give the identity, so -n is
defined at the inverse of n such that -n + n = 0.
> multiply by zero, but not divide by zero.
in the same way, multiplication has an identity element, mulitply by
_1_, that is 1*n = n. division then gives the inverse for
multiplication, and you get the reciprocals, as i outlined earlier.
so, zero is not the identity element in the algebra of multiplication
of numbers. multiply by zero is well defined but stands by itself.
> I understood someone to be saying paradoxes aren't really very
> significant in mathematics and its development.
i'll leave this for another time.
>> here is something almost as difficult:
>> whats-it-mean( divide-something-by-a-half )?
> CB: Divide something in half, two equal parts ??
no, thats divide _by_ 2. i mean divide something _by_ one-half,
(one-fourth, one-sixth, ...)
les schaffer
- Thread context:
- Re: Calculus, (continued)
- Re: Calculus,
David Welch Fri 20 Apr 2001, 15:50 GMT
- Re: Calculus,
Les Schaffer Fri 20 Apr 2001, 16:23 GMT
- Re: Calculus,
Les Schaffer Fri 20 Apr 2001, 16:40 GMT
- Re: Calculus,
Charles Brown Fri 20 Apr 2001, 17:22 GMT
- Re: Calculus,
Les Schaffer Fri 20 Apr 2001, 17:55 GMT
- Re: Calculus,
Charles Brown Fri 20 Apr 2001, 18:16 GMT
- RE: Calculus,
Craven, Jim Fri 20 Apr 2001, 18:56 GMT
- RE: Calculus,
jenyan1 Fri 20 Apr 2001, 20:38 GMT
- MARX ON THE FTAA,
jacdon Fri 20 Apr 2001, 14:24 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]