Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Calculus; paradoxes in mathematics
>>> david.welch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 04/20/01 11:27AM >>>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 09:51:36AM -0400, Charles Brown wrote:
> Why is it that one cannot divide by zero ? Seems like special pleading.
>
The definition of integer division is that a divides b if there exists
r and q such that a = r * b + q and 0 <= q < b (In words, a equals
r multiplied by b plus q and q is greater than or equal to zero and less
than b). If b is zero then there are no pairs of numbers that satisfy
that equation for any a, as can easily be verified.
((((((((
CB:
Who originated this definition ? Most division is done by people who don't use
it.
Didn't division of integers exist before this definition ? Still seems like
special
pleading, arbitrary definition. Isn't this definition introduced to avoid
paradoxes of
some sort ?
- Thread context:
- Re: division, (continued)
- Forwarded from Anthony,
Louis Proyect Fri 20 Apr 2001, 15:39 GMT
- Re: Calculus; paradoxes in mathematics,
Charles Brown Fri 20 Apr 2001, 15:34 GMT
- Re: Calculus,
Charles Brown Fri 20 Apr 2001, 14:53 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Calculus,
David Welch Fri 20 Apr 2001, 15:50 GMT
- Re: Calculus,
Les Schaffer Fri 20 Apr 2001, 16:23 GMT
- Re: Calculus,
Les Schaffer Fri 20 Apr 2001, 16:40 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]