Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: On organisation
- Subject: Re: On organisation
- From: "Macdonald Stainsby" <mstainsby@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 08:38:15 -0800
> > The FI was successful in transmitting the Marxist heritage to a
> new generation, including to revolutionary groups which became highly
> critical of the FI, and which would never have existed, except for the
> existence of the FI.
[...]
> Jurriaan
I disagree. The reason that new generations have been able to read Trotsky has
to do
with not the crazed attempts at copying his party, but rather books of great
lucidity
like Deutscher's Stalin and three parter on Trotsky, as well as magazines like
the
NLR. Today, there are no periodicals on Maoism, just the loonies like MIM.
Result? No
Maoist theory- just Maoists with a massive capital "M".
Macdonald
- Thread context:
- on organization,
George Snedeker Sat 20 Jan 2001, 16:03 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- on organization,
George Snedeker Sat 20 Jan 2001, 18:57 GMT
- Re: On organisation,
Jurriaan Bendien Sat 20 Jan 2001, 15:58 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: On organisation,
Louis Proyect Sat 20 Jan 2001, 16:03 GMT
- Re: On organisation,
Macdonald Stainsby Sat 20 Jan 2001, 16:38 GMT
- Re: On organisation,
Dayne Goodwin Sat 20 Jan 2001, 22:14 GMT
- Re: On organisation,
Louis Proyect Sun 21 Jan 2001, 00:01 GMT
- Re: On organisation,
Alan Bradley Sun 21 Jan 2001, 01:17 GMT
- Organization of a Revolutionary Party,
Macdonald Stainsby Sat 20 Jan 2001, 15:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]