Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: FW: The Economist: Why and when to go in
- Subject: RE: FW: The Economist: Why and when to go in
- From: "Mark Jones" <jones.mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 14:18:41 -0800
> I still find it hard
> to believe that most Americans share this view, or that at least a sizable
> minority of them does. That's why I began all this by saying that your
> assertion seems a bit overstated.
Look, even the 50m people who voted FOR Bush have been made fools of and been
pissed
in their eye. This is why the Bush ghouls' folie de grandeur is a mistake
worthy of
Nero. In a year's time you won't be able to find ANYONE who voted Bush. But even
that is besides the point: the point is that, when the state is overtly lawless,
power flies into the gutter. Wait and see.
Mark
- Thread context:
- RE: FW: The Economist: Why and when to go in, (continued)
- RE: FW: The Economist: Why and when to go in,
Mark Jones Sun 07 Jan 2001, 16:42 GMT
- RE: FW: The Economist: Why and when to go in,
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky Sun 07 Jan 2001, 17:55 GMT
- RE: FW: The Economist: Why and when to go in,
Mark Jones Sun 07 Jan 2001, 18:24 GMT
- RE: FW: The Economist: Why and when to go in,
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky Sun 07 Jan 2001, 20:04 GMT
- RE: FW: The Economist: Why and when to go in,
Mark Jones Sun 07 Jan 2001, 22:18 GMT
- Re: FW: The Economist: Why and when to go in,
Jose G. Perez Mon 08 Jan 2001, 06:01 GMT
- Chavez?s Record on Women is Appalling,
Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Sat 06 Jan 2001, 18:04 GMT
- Bubble definition,
Charles Brown Sat 06 Jan 2001, 17:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]