Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Pascal & Dogma (was Re: Reply on Religion and Marxism: 2)
That is the way dogma has survived -- passing
for heterodoxy.
Yoshie
P.S. Nowadays, no thinking person in academia and think tanks can
afford to seem less than "heterodox," since to be "heterodox" has
come to mean the same thing as to be "bravely on the cutting edge"
and thus become a good marketing pitch. Even conservatives have to
have a magazine named _Heterodoxy_....
(((((((((((
CB: Isn't this another word for "pluralism", neo-liberal pluralism ?
- Thread context:
- Re: happy new year to everybody.,
Charles Brown Tue 02 Jan 2001, 01:51 GMT
- Pascal & Dogma (was Re: Reply on Religion and Marxism: 2),
Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 02 Jan 2001, 01:01 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Pascal & Dogma (was Re: Reply on Religion and Marxism: 2),
Jim Farmelant Tue 02 Jan 2001, 01:37 GMT
- Re: Pascal & Dogma (was Re: Reply on Religion and Marxism: 2),
George Snedeker Tue 02 Jan 2001, 02:19 GMT
- Pascal & Dogma (was Re: Reply on Religion and Marxism: 2),
Charles Brown Tue 02 Jan 2001, 02:28 GMT
- Re: Pascal & Dogma (was Re: Reply on Religion and Marxism: 2),
Carrol Cox Tue 02 Jan 2001, 02:51 GMT
- Re: Pascal & Dogma (was Re: Reply on Religion and Marxism: 2),
Louis Proyect Tue 02 Jan 2001, 03:12 GMT
- Re: Pascal & Dogma (was Re: Reply on Religion and Marxism: 2),
Charles Brown Tue 02 Jan 2001, 16:39 GMT
- Re: Pascal & Dogma (was Re: Reply on Religion and Marxism: 2),
Mervyn Hartwig Wed 03 Jan 2001, 20:22 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]