Re: "Antarctic Zionism"

[Xxxx Xxxxxx <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I don't know what does Xxxx believe about Israel, where we have a truly
> settler
> state (not even a "tiny population with rights", a full-grown state) for more
> than 50 years (that is already one third of the timespan involved in the
> Malvinas, and thousands more people, with a vibrant culture of their own,
> etc.). But let us assume that the Israelis had been murderous or strong enough
> in 1948 to cleanse their land of any bit of Arab people that may have remained
> there. They did it in many places, in fact, and some times by forced eviction
> by military units. Then, we would have had an Arab-free fraction of Palestine
> where the Israelis WOULD HAVE NOT EXPLOITED A SINGLE ARAB. I guess that such
> being the case, and considering the argument of Xxxx that "people in the
> Malvinas do not exploit Argentineans so why not allow them to remain there
> under British flag in peace" we may also extend it to the Middle East.
>
> In fact, the official ideology of Zionism implies that Jews shouldn't exploit
> Arabs in Israel, only Jews. So that as we see, Xxxx's argument is a Zionist
> argument. Long live Xxxx, the only Antarctic Zionist!
>

Had Zionism accomplished a total ethnic cleansing of Palestinians then there
still would have been a large refugee population with rights which could
only be addressed by overthrowing the Zionist state and replacing it with a
socialist republic with the right of return for Palestinian Arabs.

I am unaware of any refugees from the Malvinas however. Perhaps Nestor could
give us some details about the camps housing Malvinas refugees?

Xxxx

=======
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message