Xxxx Xxxxxx: the ultimate Antarctic Zionist

["Gorojovsky" <Gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yesterday night, while falling asleep, I was thinking about something that 
Heinz P. Dieterich says about the current situation. He said something to the 
effect that with the recognition of a Palestinian state, USA was trying to 
stabilize the situation in the Middle East by creating a set of four states, 
namely Israel, the Palestinian State, Syria and Egypt, all of them in one way 
or other subservient to the United States.

Flashback 1: me, as a young Socialist-Zionist on my road out of Zionism in 
Israel, naively asking some instructor at a course I was receiving in Jerusaem, 
in 1971: "Why not allow the Palestinians to return?" Answer: "Because this is 
an Arab problem, they have plenty of land out there, let them receive the 
Palestinians. In fact, they are using the Palestinians against us because they 
hate our secular, advanced, Western state".

Flashback 2: in the wet, cold, misty and wind-torn plains of tall grasses of 
the Malvinas, the last group of rebel rural laborers is encircled, caught, 
eventually killed. Not a single Argentinean remains on the islands.

Thus, once the British navy invaded the Malvinas, the local population was 
either expelled (such as the Vernet family) or reduced to semi slavery and, 
once they revolted, elliminated.

I don't know what does Xxxx believe about Israel, where we have a truly settler 
state (not even a "tiny population with rights", a full-grown state) for more 
than 50 years (that is already one third of the timespan involved in the 
Malvinas, and thousands more people, with a vibrant culture of their own, 
etc.). But let us assume that the Israelis had been murderous or strong enough 
in 1948 to cleanse their land of any bit of Arab people that may have remained 
there. They did it in many places, in fact, and some times by forced eviction 
by military units. Then, we would have had an Arab-free fraction of Palestine 
where the Israelis WOULD HAVE NOT EXPLOITED A SINGLE ARAB. I guess that such 
being the case, and considering the argument of Xxxx that "people in the 
Malvinas do not exploit Argentineans so why not allow them to remain there 
under British flag in peace" we may also extend it to the Middle East.

In fact, the official ideology of Zionism implies that Jews shouldn't exploit 
Arabs in Israel, only Jews. So that as we see, Xxxx's argument is a Zionist 
argument. Long live Xxxx, the only Antarctic Zionist!

Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx
=======
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message