Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Not oil
En relación a Re: Malvinas,
el 13 Oct 01, a las 16:44, Xxxx Xxxxxx dijo:
> I suspect, like Louis, that the resource question is at the heart of the
> dispute on both sides. If the Argentine government got control over the
> resources of the seabed surrounding the islands I suspect interest in the
> islands themselves would fade despite Nestor's talk of individual Argentines
> "loving" the islands etc.
>
I am not sure that Louis shares Xxxx's suspect. The oil issue only added to the
interest of Britain. We Argentineans knew the importance of not having a
British outpost on our territory much before oil became important in the world
economy. That is why NO Argentinean government ever accepted the invasion, not
even the most pro-imperialist ones.
Simply we shall not surrender the Islands to the Empire. That is all.
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx
=======
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message
- Thread context:
- Re: Malvinas, (continued)
- Re: Malvinas,
Xxxx Xxxxxx Sat 13 Oct 2001, 20:51 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: Malvinas,
Gorojovsky Sun 14 Oct 2001, 02:38 GMT
- Not oil,
Gorojovsky Sun 14 Oct 2001, 02:38 GMT
- Re: Malvinas,
Xxxx Xxxxxx Sun 14 Oct 2001, 17:34 GMT
- Re The West and the Rest,
John Landon Wed 10 Oct 2001, 16:40 GMT
- Lecturing the Left -- Who Needs That?,
Hunter Gray Wed 10 Oct 2001, 16:12 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]