Re: Malvinas

["Gorojovsky" <Gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

En relación a Re: Malvinas, 
el 13 Oct 01, a las 16:44, Xxxx Xxxxxx dijo:

> does Nestor not think that supporting the regime's rights to
> jail its opponents leads to a strengthening of the regime?

Ah, dragged along by Xxxx's ignorance, again. Let us put things clear here: 
does Xxxx believe that "the regime = the military"? 

Yes, or not?

If yes, then I guess he would have backed all that happened after the defeat in 
1982, namely the continuation of "the regime" by "constitutional" means. If 
not, then he would perhaps suspect that the military could have broken an 
unwritten rule, and that perhaps the Americans helped them do so in order to 
get rid of them and pass on the Presidence to a "civilian".

In fact, all the supporters of "the regime" were hydrophobically _against_ the 
war, and all those who fought against "the regime" supported it more or less in 
the terms I have exposed here. Suffice it to say that many of those who were 
tear gassed in May Square on March 30th, 1982, rallied at the same place on 
April 2nd, 1982. They understood that (as we say in my country)"at last a shot 
had been fired to serve Justice!".

Xxxx shares the position of Alfonsín, Cavallo, and Menem. I oppose the three of 
them, and also the "regime".

Maybe too much for his British selfishness.

Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx
=======
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message