Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
I can't believe Lou thinks Islamism is progressive.
In a message dated 10/11/01 1:02:24 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lnp3@xxxxxxxxx
writes:
<< On
one hand, it played a reactionary role in Yugoslavia. On the other, it has
proved its mettle in Palestine and elsewhere. Unless we come to terms with
the thing-in-itself, rather than projecting our political agenda on it, we
will continue to get it wrong.. >>
Uhh, unless I am mistaken we are talking about OSAM BIN ALDEN and his
Islamists, are we not? Osama bin laden, billionaire representative of the
royal family of Saudi Arabia, who are scum bags as bad as any, and of his
faction, born of the Wahabbi Islamist rape of Afghanistan. The U.S. and
Saudis did not pour SIX billions into the hands of these "anti-imperialists"?
Into the hands of precisley the forces of osama bin Laden? They were not
backed to the hilt by the worst reactionaries, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan?
They did not attack Afghanistan like a disease? They were not then sent out
to the balkans, into the former Soviet Republics and elsewhere to act as part
of the US assault? This is "progressive"?
Unbelievable.
Jared
=======
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message
- Thread context:
- Bin Laden's Earlier Statement, Quoted by UPI from 'Unmat', a pro-Taliban paper",
Borba100 Fri 12 Oct 2001, 05:34 GMT
- Article with 1 of several sources for bin Laden statement that he's not anti-US,
Borba100 Fri 12 Oct 2001, 05:28 GMT
- US attacks: Osama points finger at India,
Ulhas Joglekar Fri 12 Oct 2001, 04:00 GMT
- I can't believe Lou thinks Islamism is progressive.,
Borba100 Fri 12 Oct 2001, 03:56 GMT
- More on bin laden's convenient reversal of position,
Borba100 Fri 12 Oct 2001, 02:14 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]