Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame

To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame
From: Borba100@xxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:44:32 EDT

In a message dated 9/16/01 10:30:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
lause@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<<
The idea of a conspiracy by the US government on this is absurd >>

Brilliant response. I am floored.

Jared
=======
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame
  - From: Carrol Cox

Prev by Date: Afghanistan background
Next by Date: IRSP: Irish Department of Foreign Affairs Must Intervene Over Turkish Death Fast
Previous by thread: Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame
Next by thread: Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame, (continued)
  - Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame, Antonio Sánchez Thu 13 Sep 2001, 22:16 GMT
  - Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame, Mark Lause Sun 16 Sep 2001, 14:36 GMT
  - Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame, Borba100 Fri 14 Sep 2001, 04:34 GMT
    - Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame, ermadog Fri 14 Sep 2001, 06:17 GMT
  - Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame, Borba100 Sun 16 Sep 2001, 21:49 GMT
    - Re: Conceding the enemy's argument - shame, Carrol Cox Mon 17 Sep 2001, 00:09 GMT
- Suspects' Flight Trainer Casts Doubt on Official Story, Borba100 Thu 13 Sep 2001, 19:26 GMT
  - Re: Suspects' Flight Trainer Casts Doubt on Official Story, Adam Levenstein Thu 13 Sep 2001, 21:16 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - RE: Suspects' Flight Trainer Casts Doubt on Official Story, Craven, Jim Thu 13 Sep 2001, 22:27 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]