Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: CPC, freedom of expression ( Re: Argentina: the "plan" of Cavallo has been unleashed)




--- "Henry C.K. Liu" <hliu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Revolutionaries can't afford *not* to doubt. If
> you
> > stop doubting, you stop being able to objectively
> > critique - and correct - your mistakes.
>
> The moments of doubt is before the beginning of the
> revolution. A
> revolution begins not as a mob uprising but must
> have a political
> agenda, developed by a political party with a
> central committee which
> works out all the doubts and options and develops a
> political line and
> strategy around which all party members rally and
> support.

OK, so before the revolution, the entire plan is layed
out? As in, after the revolution, nothing will change
for the next few millenia?

I repeat - bullshit.

I don't care how hammered out your line is, how set
you are, how much you have planned - shit happens.
Things change. If anything is an anarchist view, it's
the ridiculous idea that after the revolution, no
further governing is needed - because everything's
already hammered out.

The whole idea that a revolutionary party is needed to
guide the revolution along is central to Bolshevik
thinking. And as the revolution progresses, errors can
be (and are) made.

> Political party are of course error prone. But it
> is not for every
> individual to decide personally. In communist
> parties, different
> processes have been developed to handle debates and
> discussions.

But if they're not free to question, to doubt, such
"processes" are irrelevant. Because questioning - and
thus correcting - is not permitted.

> >
> > If that comes with people thinking reactionary
> > thoughts, so be it - that's called a "necessary
> evil."
> > Stopping such thoughts is impractical anyway, and
> > trying to stop them leads to a society of
> witchunts.
> >
> > How can the people effectively administer society
> if
> > they do not have the freedom to criticize
> themselves
> > and their peers?
>
> That is an anarchist view.

No, it's a legitimate question - one I notice you
refuse to answer. How are people supposed to correct
errors if they're not permitted to notice them?


=====
Adam Levenstein cleon42@xxxxxxxxx
ICQ: 17125158

And now, for something completely different.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]