Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: On Nestor's "analysis"
Julio Huato:
>Let us look at the facts. Capitalism emerged as a mode of production in
>Europe in the 16th century. There was no state power assisting it. If
>anything, there were state powers blocking it, taxing it, slowing it down.
>If capitalists needed their interests to be protected, they had to buy their
>influence. It was until the 18th and 19th centuries that European
>capitalists succeeded at organizing state powers specifically devoted to
>protect their interests. This is a historical fact.
A historical fact? What do you call the British East India Company? Or the
Hudson Bay Company? The mercantile phase of capitalism is marked by a
tightly-knit symbiotic relationship between the state and embryonic forms
of capital. The state protected such ventures as seedlings are protected in
a nursery. All this is discussed at length in v3 of Capital. Maybe you
should stick to abstractions and lay off the facts.
Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org/
- Thread context:
- Re: On Nestor's "analysis", (continued)
- Re: On Nestor's "analysis",
Charles Brown Wed 09 May 2001, 20:58 GMT
- Re: On Nestor's "analysis",
Julio Huato Thu 10 May 2001, 04:08 GMT
- Re: On Nestor's "analysis",
Charles Brown Fri 11 May 2001, 17:06 GMT
- Re: On Nestor's "analysis",
Julio Huato Fri 11 May 2001, 22:12 GMT
- Re: On Nestor's "analysis",
Xxxx Xxxxxx Fri 11 May 2001, 23:38 GMT
- Re: On Nestor's "analysis",
Julio Huato Sat 12 May 2001, 21:55 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]