Re: bourgeois medicine

[Marta Russell <ap888@xxxxxxxx>]

Adam Levenstein wrote:
>

> >  As most
> > people well know when there is no one to contest
> > what a doctor does
> > there is no accountability (both of which seem to be
> > lacking in
> > Holland according to many accounts).
>
> Perhaps instead of reading "many accounts," you might
> try reading the law in question, which has quite a bit
> of accountability; consulting with another doctor is
> merely the lowest level.

You haven't read the Remlink Report which shows solid evidence of
abuse in the years that assisted suicide was court sanctioned but not
a "law."  It won't be much different now since its pretty much the
same routine.  Over 25,000 people were killed involuntarily.
>
> > Besides the health minister for the Soviet Union
> > said he would never
> > support such a law.  Bravo!
>
> And this would be relevant because...?

He can spot a bit of bourgeois shit when he sees it.
>
>
> > I refer you to disability groups who have researched
> > quite thoroughly
> > the issue:
>
> And once again, I refer you to the actual law. I find
> primary sources to be infinitely more reliable than
> secondhand. Even if the secondhand sources "researched
> quite thoroughly the issue."
>
Since when did Marxists develop such a belief in what bourgeois state
laws say -- I mean as if the laws are enforced ?   Civil rights laws
are not enforced in the US. I find your reasoning so well -- bourgeois.

Secondly, if you read what disabled people (THE PEOPLE!) have to say
you might learn something.


Marta