Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Evolutionism vs historicism
>>> j.bendien@xxxxxxxxxx 12/27/00 08:28PM >>>
-clip-
According to the Stalinist interpretation of historical materialism (to
which Althusser incidentally still to a great extent subscribes, with his
"process without a subject"), history is determined by iron laws impervious
to the intervention of individuals and groups. Thus, for instance,
socialism is portrayed as the inevitable successor of capitalism, a product
of historical laws working themselves out with iron necessity in a sequence
of steps or stages.
-clip-
CB: So , were Marx and Engels Stalinists when they said in _The Manifesto of the
Communist Party_
"What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers.
Its
fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable. "
- Thread context:
- Re: Evolutionism vs historicism, (continued)
- Re: Evolutionism vs historicism,
Charles Brown Wed 27 Dec 2000, 14:22 GMT
- Re: Evolutionism vs historicism,
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky Wed 27 Dec 2000, 19:14 GMT
- Re: Evolutionism vs historicism,
Jurriaan Bendien Thu 28 Dec 2000, 01:31 GMT
- Evolutionism vs historicism,
Charles Brown Thu 28 Dec 2000, 17:59 GMT
- Re: Evolutionism vs historicism,
Charles Brown Thu 28 Dec 2000, 18:15 GMT
- Beat Takeshi,
Louis Proyect Tue 26 Dec 2000, 22:01 GMT
- Re: We must be doing something wrong,
Juan Fajardo Tue 26 Dec 2000, 21:03 GMT
- Re: religion and marxism?,
Juan Fajardo Tue 26 Dec 2000, 20:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]