Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: evolutionism vs. historicism
- Subject: Re: evolutionism vs. historicism
- From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:12:05 -0800
snnoonan wrote:
> . . .
> couching a position in dialectical terminology is not the same as grasping
> the processes of the dialectic itself.
Perhaps the single most important statement on dialectics ever made
was by Engels in the Anti-Duhring in which he points out that *only*
a detailed historical development of a point in *Capital* did Marx
*then* remark, as a sort of addendum, that the process described
illustrated a dialectical principle. I myself tend to be very skeptical
of arguments which use the word dialectics or dialectical in the
first few sentences. And at least half of arguments which include the
word historical in the first sentence are similarly suspect. An analysis
must, by its detail, *earn* the right to those terms.
Carrol
- Thread context:
- Worst workplace shooting rampage in US history,
Louis Proyect Wed 27 Dec 2000, 16:12 GMT
- evolutionism vs. historicism,
snnoonan Wed 27 Dec 2000, 12:48 GMT
- (Spanish) Xmas criticisms to the Alianza government - A correction on unemployment indexes,
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky Wed 27 Dec 2000, 09:55 GMT
- Gyan on religion (was Re: ca[r]rol and lou on religion),
TheRevWilliams Wed 27 Dec 2000, 08:52 GMT
- utopias,
snnoonan Wed 27 Dec 2000, 04:29 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: utopias,
Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 27 Dec 2000, 20:02 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]