Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Back to Matt was Re: Replying to Gary was Re: Once more on you know what...
- Subject: Re: Back to Matt was Re: Replying to Gary was Re: Once more on you know what...
- From: "Jose G. Perez" <jg_perez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 19:33:10 -0800
>>But let me try and answer honestly what I see as your key question - Do I
see the Democrats as some kind of substitute Labor Party? In other words
do I have in some part of my brain internalised a model that comes from the
Days of Earl Browder? Do I think that the Democrats have a different
relationship to the working class than the Republican Party?<<
Try this thought on for size:
Do you see the labor parties as some sort of substitute for a workers party?
In what sense are the British labor party, the Australian labor party, etc.,
workers parties at all? In what way do they represent MOTION towards genuine
independent working class political action?
José
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary MacLennan" <g.maclennan@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 5:27 PM
Subject: Back to Matt was Re: Replying to Gary was Re: Once more on you know
what...
- Thread context:
- Re: Back to Matt was Re: Replying to Gary was Re: Once more on you know what...,
Jose G. Perez Mon 18 Dec 2000, 03:33 GMT
- (Spanish) Firmenich, Part II,
Les Schaffer Mon 18 Dec 2000, 02:34 GMT
- (Spanish) Firmenich, Part I,
Les Schaffer Mon 18 Dec 2000, 02:31 GMT
- World growth to slow down to 3.4% in 2001 EIU,
Ulhas Joglekar Mon 18 Dec 2000, 01:35 GMT
- Secret Evidence, "Anti-Terrorism," & the INS,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 17 Dec 2000, 21:49 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]