Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: NACLA and Colombia
> >..."most authoritative" according to who?
> >Michael Hoover
>
> Michael, for activists like myself the NACLA Report was an indispensable
> tool during the 1980s.
> Michael Hoover himself told me that Weeks is a Brennerite in good standing.
> Louis Proyect
You didn 't answer my question. And I don't need lecture on NACLA, I
started reading it in 74 when I had good fortune to have comparative
politics prof assign some readings.
Only reference to John Weeks that I can remember making is in context of
response by certain marxists to Arghiri Emmanuel's failure to consider mode
of production. I mentioned that Weeks, Bill Warren, Gary Howe, & David
Harvey, for example, had never accepted dependency concept on grounds that
it addresses conditions between nations rather than classes & that it
emphasizes exchange rather than production. Their heightened criticism
came at time (mid-1970s) when dependency theory was gaining adherents.
I don't know if above makes JW a Brennerite or not. I don't know what a
Brennerite is. I guess my problem is that I don't think in such
reductionist terms. Michael Hoover
- Thread context:
- Forwarded from Anthony (accepting aid),
Louis Proyect Wed 13 Dec 2000, 14:36 GMT
- Re: NACLA and Colombia,
Michael Hoover Wed 13 Dec 2000, 13:21 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: NACLA and Colombia,
Louis Proyect Wed 13 Dec 2000, 14:57 GMT
- Re: NACLA and Colombia,
Michael Hoover Fri 15 Dec 2000, 18:58 GMT
- Re: NACLA and Colombia,
Louis Proyect Fri 15 Dec 2000, 19:04 GMT
- Re: NACLA and Colombia,
Michael Hoover Sat 16 Dec 2000, 00:51 GMT
- Re: NACLA and Colombia,
Louis Proyect Sat 16 Dec 2000, 01:09 GMT
- Re: NACLA and Colombia,
Debordagoria Sat 16 Dec 2000, 14:23 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]