Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
The Bush campaign against the Black vote
- Subject: The Bush campaign against the Black vote
- From: "Jose G. Perez" <jg_perez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 22:23:28 -0800
Dec. 7, 2000, New York Times op-ed piece
IN AMERICA
Keep Them Out!
By BOB HERBERT
The tactics have changed, but the goal remains depressingly the same: Keep
the coloreds, the blacks, the African-Americans - whatever they're called in
the particular instance - keep them out of the voting booths.
Do not let them vote! If you can find a way to stop them, stop them.
So here we go again, this time in Florida.
It turns out that the state of Florida is using a private company with close
ties to the Republican Party to help "cleanse" the state's voter
registration rolls. Would it surprise anyone anywhere to learn that the
cleansing process somehow managed to improperly prevent large numbers of
African-American voters from voting in the presidential election?
Gregory Palast, a reporter with the online magazine Salon, has done a number
of articles on this. He noted that the company, ChoicePoint, and its
subsidiary, Database Technologies Inc. (DBT), came up with a "scrub list" of
173,000 names. These were the names of people registered to vote in Florida
who, according to ChoicePoint, could be knocked off the rolls for one reason
or another.
There was good reason for Florida to be concerned about the integrity of its
voter registration rolls. In 1997 the mayor of Miami was removed from office
because widespread fraud had occurred in the election. The following year a
law was passed requiring counties in Florida to purge the rolls of duplicate
registrations, the names of deceased persons and felons.
So far, so good. The problems developed when the state turned to
ChoicePoint, which compiles and sells vast amounts of frequently shaky
information about individuals. (ChoicePoint, which acquired DBT last May,
was fired by the state of Pennsylvania for breaching the confidentiality of
driving records.) With this private outfit in the picture it soon became
clear that top Republican officials would be trying to reap a partisan
political advantage from a law designed to correct an egregious wrong. And t
hat partisan advantage would be realized in large part by trampling on the
voting rights of minorities.
Over the spring and summer ChoicePoint was forced to acknowledge that 8,000
voters it had listed as felons had in fact been guilty only of misdemeanors,
which would not have affected their right to vote. What is maddening is that
when such an erroneous list of names gets into the hands of county election
officials, as this one did, it is very difficult - often impossible - to
find out what's correct and what's not correct.
That snickering you hear is from Republican operatives who know that these
kinds of foul-ups, because they are based on criminal records, will
disproportionately affect minority voters.
ChoicePoint eventually came up with a "corrected" list of 173,000 names of
people it targeted as ineligible because they were deceased, or were
registered more than once, or had been convicted of a felony.
But it was a lousy list, riddled with mistakes. And in an interview with me
yesterday, Marty Fagan, a ChoicePoint vice president, said there had never
been any expectation that the list would be particularly accurate. Remember
now, we're talking about a list that would be used to strip Americans of the
precious right to vote.
Mr. Fagan said the list focused on people who "might" have been deceased, or
might have been listed twice, or "possible felons." He said it was
"important to know" that the information needed to be "verified" by county
election officials.
That was interesting, because ChoicePoint came up with 58,000 people -
people registered to vote - who would fall into the category he calls
"possible felons." How in the world were county election officials supposed
to check out each and every one and find out if they were felons or not?
They couldn't. They didn't.
The horror stories about perfectly innocent black voters being turned away
from the polls because they had been targeted as convicted felons started
coming in early on the morning of Nov. 7, Election Day. And they're still
coming in.
Blacks turned out to vote in record numbers in Florida this year, but huge
numbers were systematically turned away for one specious reason after
another.
The tactics have changed, but the goal remains the same.
- Thread context:
- rationalizatin and reification,
snnoonan Fri 08 Dec 2000, 08:04 GMT
- From Salon,
Jose G. Perez Fri 08 Dec 2000, 06:55 GMT
- More on the elections from non-U.S. press,
Jose G. Perez Fri 08 Dec 2000, 06:38 GMT
- What the Bush Klan was up to...,
Jose G. Perez Fri 08 Dec 2000, 06:30 GMT
- The Bush campaign against the Black vote,
Jose G. Perez Fri 08 Dec 2000, 06:23 GMT
- How Florida cleaned Blacks off its voting rolls,
Lou Paulsen Fri 08 Dec 2000, 06:12 GMT
- The real Florida Vote,
Jose G. Perez Fri 08 Dec 2000, 06:07 GMT
- The racist US election,
Jose G. Perez Fri 08 Dec 2000, 06:04 GMT
- Active and passive euthanasia in capitalist health care,
Lou Paulsen Fri 08 Dec 2000, 05:42 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]