Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: the role of forced labor
- Subject: Re: the role of forced labor
- From: "Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky" <Gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 09:48:06 -0800
En relación a the role of forced labor,
el 25 Nov 00, a las 12:16, snedeker dijo:
"I don't think that we should get hung up on the concept of waged labor. various
forms of forced labor have existed along side of wage labor. this is still the
case
in the world economy. Marx does not solve this problem with his discussion of
capitalism in England. it is true that he stresses the role of wage labor.
perhaps
he was not fully aware of the role forced labor played in the accumulation of
capital."
The importance of wage labor is that it is the expression of the transformation
of
human energy into a commodity "like anything else".
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: on the American election - a query and a comment, (continued)
- Re: Anxious Krugman: "The Bond Market Warning Us of TurbulenceAhead" (was Re: NY Times: clueless on Argentina),
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 25 Nov 2000, 18:50 GMT
- the role of forced labor,
snedeker Sat 25 Nov 2000, 17:17 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: the role of forced labor,
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky Sat 25 Nov 2000, 17:48 GMT
- Re: the role of forced labor,
snedeker Sat 25 Nov 2000, 18:12 GMT
- Re: the role of forced labor,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 25 Nov 2000, 18:34 GMT
- Re: the role of forced labor,
Lou Paulsen Sat 25 Nov 2000, 18:52 GMT
- Re: the role of forced labor,
snedeker Sat 25 Nov 2000, 18:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]