Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Rain
- Subject: Re: Rain
- From: "Macdonald Stainsby" <mstainsby@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 09:09:38 -0800
> Mainly, I expect that if the climatologists who are in the pay of
the
> bourgeoisie are producing bad results, predictions, theories, or
advice
> which are the products of class bias, pressure, bribery, etc., then
the
> communist climatologists will sound the alarm bell and expose the
bourgeois
> plots.
Something I need to know: WHY???
WHY on (insert planet here) would the ruling class "make up" a series
of scientific sounding predictions that lead to a neccessity for
planned economic systems, the abolition of the private automobile and
generally make unfettered growth 'seem' impossible if humanity is to
continue on? Can anyone explain that? Comrades are absolutely right to
state that these realities are twisted into a new form of
protectionism and general Imperialism when directed at the Third
World. So are 'human rights'. That does not invalidate those rights
seperate from their greatest violators. Nor does the despoliation of
the atmosphere.
Macdonald
- Thread context:
- Re: Rain, (continued)
- Re: Rain,
Carrol Cox Fri 17 Nov 2000, 23:01 GMT
- RE: Rain,
E.C.Apling Sat 18 Nov 2000, 09:31 GMT
- Re: Rain,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 19 Nov 2000, 07:06 GMT
- Re: Rain,
Lou Paulsen Sun 19 Nov 2000, 13:53 GMT
- Re: Rain,
Macdonald Stainsby Sun 19 Nov 2000, 17:09 GMT
- Re: Rain,
David Welch Sun 19 Nov 2000, 20:17 GMT
- RE: Rain,
E.C.Apling Sun 19 Nov 2000, 20:49 GMT
- Re: Rain,
Louis Proyect Sun 19 Nov 2000, 21:12 GMT
- Re: Rain,
Brian James Sun 19 Nov 2000, 23:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]