Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Contextualizing Hate: The Hague Tribunal, the Clinton






See the full article at http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/kent.htm

Click here for a printable version

Contextualizing Hate: The Hague Tribunal, the Clinton
Administration and the Serbs

by Raymond K. Kent, Professor Emeritus of History, University of
California at Berkeley

[Note from http://www.emperors-clothes.com : this article is long and
and some of the most important insights are to be found in the middle
and end. We urge you to read the entire piece; you'll come out with
much understanding. The Professor definitely knows his stuff.]

Some sixteen years ago, Anthropology Professor George Vid
Tomashevsich (University of Buffalo) pleaded for non- interference
in Yugoslavia by foreign powers and issued this warning in a letter to
the New York Times (1 April, 1980):

"...splitting up the admittedly imperfect but viable
Yugoslav Federation would be virtually impossible
without drastic and brutal political and economic surgery,
which at best could not fully satisfy any of the separated
parts. Every conceivable divorce between Serbia and
Croatia would of necessity involve not only a painful
partition of Bosnia and Herzegovina but also the
explosive question of the ethnic identity of the Yugoslav
Moslems and nightmarish ex- changes of hundreds of
thousands of uprooted Serbs and Croats from the
disputed territories... "

Biased from the Start

In 1993, as the Clinton Administration decided on an undeclared war
against the Bosnian Serbs, the United Nations Security Council set
up an International Tribunal to deal with war crimes in the former
Yugoslavia since 1991. It was housed at the Hague, not far from the
venerable World Court, extant since 1907. The UN Charter made no
provision for such a Tribunal (1). Two Muslim states, Pakistan and
Malaysia, were among the earliest financial backers. None of the
initial 25 hand-picked jurists came from a single country that could be

held to be favorable to the Serbs on either political or religious
grounds or both (2). The Tribunal's first investigative Commission
was headed by an ardent Sunni Muslim scholar from Egypt. His
report on war crimes concerned exclusively a section of eastern
Bosnia with a once-predominantly Muslim population. It was here,
after the international recognition of Bosnia as a state in April 1992,

that a collection of Serb irregulars, many fresh out of criminal jails,

crossed over and spread terror widely noted in the global media. In
its aftermath there was no shortage of war criminals.

Murder of Slovonian Serbs...

Although the investigative time-frame included 1991, the
Commission remained silent about another, much larger, event that
took place between August 1991 and early 1992. In what is known as
Western Slavonia, when both Croat irregulars and Croatia's newly
formed army went on a terror campaign in which 189 Serb villages
were destroyed, several thousand Serb civilians were killed, 70
Orthodox churches were systematically destroyed, Serb priests and
even a Bishop were arrested, while some 40,000 refugees fled in
disarray into Bosnia and Serbia. A substantial Serb population in the
major Slavonian city of Vukovar disappeared without having fled,
leaving traces of torture in the old Austrian catacombs under the city
along with evidence of murder and rape.

...is not noticed

The Western media, whose demonization of the Serbs was already
well underway, chose to overlook these events whose crucial
significance was thus completely missed by the outside world. It was
the massive Croat purge of western Slavonia's Serbs that ushered in
and provoked the "modern" post-World War II "ethnic cleansing"
which was pinned exclusively on the Serbs in 1992, some months
after the whole of western Slavonia was "freed" and left to the
Croats alone. What gives the western Slavonian event (3) an even
more acute significance is its impact on the Serbs in general who
immediately saw the replay of what was done to the Serbs in Croatia
and Bosnia between 1941-1945 (4).

Serbians have the same reason
'never to forget' as the Jews

Involving the loss of the lives of several hundred thousand Serb men,
women and children in the two regions, that was by far the most
bestial example of war crimes in all of Europe under the German
Nazi hegemony.

Some Serbs were carved up alive or roasted on the spit. In several
hundred cases eyes were gouged out with spoons. Hundreds were
burned alive in their tightly shut Orthodox churches. Small children
were smashed against walls, decapitations and rapes were
commonplace, thousands were buried in mass and individual graves
as well as caves, tens of thousands were put in 22concentration
camps in Croatia and Bosnia, thousands more were forcibly
converted into another branch of Christianity, countless thousands
fled in terror out of immediate reach. (5) To be sure, these gruesome
crimes were mainly the work of Croat Nazis, none of whose
higher-ranking members were ever tried for war crimes.

WWII slaughter: it shocked the
German Nazis

Even officers of the German regular army stationed in the regions
felt uncomfortable with the ongoing mayhem. It was hence not
difficult to whip the Serb irregulars of April 1992 into a frenzy as
their commander "Arkan" (Zeljko Raznatovic) swore that "never
again "would the Serbs submit to being ruled by others or permit
mass exterminations and mass expulsions of fellow-Serbs "wherever
they may be, "with reprisals "sure to follow." (6) Arkan then moved
into Slavonia and Serb-held Krajina to inflict misery on the Croat
peasants who had nothing to do with the earlier ethnic cleansing of
the Serbs from western Slavonia.He thus stepped right into the full
view of UN observers and the global media, making it impossible to
save the Serbs as a nation from hatreds knowing no bounds and
continuing to flourish outside any historic context (7).

Some are more equal than others

By the start of 1996, the Tribunal's expenditures topped $40,000,000,
mostly for salaries. It had indicted 46 Serbs, 8 Croats and one
Muslim for war crimes. The Serbs were on the Tribunal's list for
crimes against both the Croats and Muslims, the Croats allegedly
committed crimes against the Bosnian Muslims while the sole
Muslim was charged with crimes against the Bosnian Croats (8).

Belated indictments - for public
relations?

In the third week of March 1996, there was an unusual addition to
the list of war criminals sought. Three Bosnian Muslims and one
Croat were indicted for crimes committed against the Serbs. Indeed,
up until then, after more than two years of activity, the Tribunal had
somehow failed to indict anyone for a wartime crime against a single
Serb. This is despite the fact that, by the start of 1996, there were
over 1,000,000 Serb refugees from western Slavonia, Krajina and
Bosnia, that thousands of Serb civilians had been killed in these
sections of "old" Yugoslavia, and that this was done by the Croat
irregulars, Croatia's regular army, Bosnian Croats and Muslims
alike. The ethnic cleansing of Krajina (August 1995),affecting some
200,000 Serbs, mostly of peasant stock, dwarfed any other instance
of such "cleansing" in the former Yugoslavia, during the five-year
old civil war among three main co-belligerents. The Bosnian
government's army destroyed scores of Orthodox Christian churches
and used regularly the United Nations-designated "safe zones" from
which to attack the near-by rural Serbs in raids that would never
reach the Western European or American TV screens.



--

Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx
PhD Student
Department of Political Science
SUNY at Albany
Nelson A. Rockefeller College
135 Western Ave.; Milne 102
Albany, NY 12222



____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________
Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633
___________________________________________________________







Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]