Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement
> As I said, I do know people who do, or at least did claim this (that all
such heterosexual relationships are oppressive). Of
> course it is an empty statement to simply say, without context, that
> such relationships are "potentially" oppressive. The context was the
> assumption that they "usually are", made by Anthony and supported by
> Lou Poulson.
>
> (((((((((((
>
> CB: It is logic analogous to that of statutory rape laws. Below a
> certain age there is no consent, and there is a presumed impermissable
> power differential.
>
I agree Charles. I specifically excluded child sex from my defense
of sex across a wide age barrier.
Cheers,
John Edmundson
- Thread context:
- Re: no PCs for 3rd World sez Gates, (continued)
- Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement,
John Edmundson Thu 09 Nov 2000, 07:47 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement,
John Edmundson Thu 09 Nov 2000, 07:48 GMT
- Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement,
Charles Brown Thu 09 Nov 2000, 14:06 GMT
- Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement,
John Edmundson Thu 09 Nov 2000, 20:35 GMT
- What's in the latest Green Left Weekly? #427 November 8, 2000,
Green Left Parramatta Thu 09 Nov 2000, 03:43 GMT
- Nietzsche?,
Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 09 Nov 2000, 02:43 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Nietzsche?,
James Farmelant Thu 09 Nov 2000, 15:21 GMT
- David McReynolds statement,
Louis Proyect Thu 09 Nov 2000, 01:10 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]