Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement
>>> JWE21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 11/09/00 02:44AM >>>
> John Edmundson wrote:
>
> > between older men and younger women are "potentially" oppressive.
>
> That seems a careful statement -- they certainly are potentially
> oppressive and I don't see why anyone would dispute the position so
> stated. No one that I know of says they are *always* oppressive.
As I said, I do know people who do, or at least did claim this. Of
course it is an empty statement to simply say, without context,
that such relationships are "potentially" oppressive. The context
was the assumption that they "usually are", made by Anthony and
supported by Lou Poulson.
(((((((((((
CB: It is logic analogous to that of statutory rape laws. Below a certain age
there is
no consent, and there is a presumed impermissable power differential.
- Thread context:
- Re: no PCs for 3rd World sez Gates, (continued)
- Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement,
John Edmundson Thu 09 Nov 2000, 07:47 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement,
John Edmundson Thu 09 Nov 2000, 07:48 GMT
- Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement,
Charles Brown Thu 09 Nov 2000, 14:06 GMT
- Re: Male Supremacy, Sexism, & the Workers' Movement,
John Edmundson Thu 09 Nov 2000, 20:35 GMT
- What's in the latest Green Left Weekly? #427 November 8, 2000,
Green Left Parramatta Thu 09 Nov 2000, 03:43 GMT
- Nietzsche?,
Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 09 Nov 2000, 02:43 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Nietzsche?,
James Farmelant Thu 09 Nov 2000, 15:21 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]