Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Evidence versus implication
>>> furuhashi.1@xxxxxxx 11/06/00 08:06PM >>>
In any case, though, Foster & McNally, unlike you & Lou, are capable
of discussing & criticizing Brenner's article without dismissing
everything he has to say; lumping him together with the likes of
Eugene Genovese & Bill Warren; etc. If only you guys could emulate
Foster & McNally here, our "debate" will be more constructive.
((((((((((
CB: Myself, I'm aiming to emulate Karl Marx , W.E.B Dubois, and Angela Davis,
in this
debate. Marx spoke directly on many of the issues in debate.
- Thread context:
- Re: Nader/U.S. Election, (continued)
- Re: On Marxist scholasticism was Re: Nader/U.S. Election,
mike pearn Tue 07 Nov 2000, 00:44 GMT
- Evidence versus implication,
Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Tue 07 Nov 2000, 00:16 GMT
- Re: Clerical mistake (was National question again again again (was Re: Question on),
Jose G. Perez Tue 07 Nov 2000, 00:09 GMT
- Chattel Slavery, Colonialism, & Capitalism,
Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 07 Nov 2000, 00:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]