Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: E. Wood's defence of Brenner/
- Subject: Re: E. Wood's defence of Brenner/
- From: Gary Maclennan <g.maclennan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 21:18:37 -0800
At 23:00 6/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Yoshie et al
>
>Brenner's comment that we have to look at slavery in early Africa and class
>structures in early Africa to understandthe insignificance of the Atlantic
>slave trade is -- in my view -- a thinly veiled recitation ofthe
>conservative Africanst view ( Thornto, Curtin)that Africans were natural
>slavers (Thornton: they valued wealth in slaves, not land) and were somehow
>"naturally" in a slave mode of production.
>
> >From which it follows that Eureopeans really weren't to blame for the
>African slave trade-- they just put slavery to productive use. I call these
>p[eople the "absolutionist hisaorians" because they absolve Euros of most
>of the blame for the horrors of trhe Atlantic salve trade and New World
>slavery,
>
>
>Jim B
Nice to see you back Jim and as always such clarity!
regards
Gary
- Thread context:
- Most 'normal' heterosexual relationships (was: Re: Healy and Sex),
Lou Paulsen Tue 07 Nov 2000, 04:34 GMT
- Re: Capitalism as slavery and colonialism,
James M. Blaut Tue 07 Nov 2000, 04:19 GMT
- Re: E. Wood's defence of Brenner/,
James M. Blaut Tue 07 Nov 2000, 04:03 GMT
- Re: Healy and Sex,
John Edmundson Tue 07 Nov 2000, 03:09 GMT
- Re: Nader/U.S. Election,
mike pearn Tue 07 Nov 2000, 00:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]