Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: E. Wood's defence of Brenner/
Yoshie et al
Brenner's comment that we have to look at slavery in early Africa and class
structures in early Africa to understandthe insignificance of the Atlantic
slave trade is -- in my view -- a thinly veiled recitation ofthe
conservative Africanst view ( Thornto, Curtin)that Africans were natural
slavers (Thornton: they valued wealth in slaves, not land) and were somehow
"naturally" in a slave mode of production.
>From which it follows that Eureopeans really weren't to blame for the
African slave trade-- they just put slavery to productive use. I call these
p[eople the "absolutionist hisaorians" because they absolve Euros of most
of the blame for the horrors of trhe Atlantic salve trade and New World
slavery,
Jim B
- Thread context:
- Final words in reply to Mike,
Gary Maclennan Tue 07 Nov 2000, 04:43 GMT
- Most 'normal' heterosexual relationships (was: Re: Healy and Sex),
Lou Paulsen Tue 07 Nov 2000, 04:34 GMT
- Re: Capitalism as slavery and colonialism,
James M. Blaut Tue 07 Nov 2000, 04:19 GMT
- Re: E. Wood's defence of Brenner/,
James M. Blaut Tue 07 Nov 2000, 04:03 GMT
- Re: Healy and Sex,
John Edmundson Tue 07 Nov 2000, 03:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]