Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:3388] Re: Brenner Redux (was Re: Russell R. Menard onEric Williams)
- Subject: [PEN-L:3388] Re: Brenner Redux (was Re: Russell R. Menard onEric Williams)
- From: "Charles Brown" <CharlesB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 11:22:32 -0700
>>> furuhashi.1@xxxxxxx 10/22/00 12:53PM >>>
Remember that Robert Brenner was writing not just scholarly articles
but _political tracts_ against neo-Malthusians, world systems theory,
etc. -- hence his polemical _emphasis_ on class struggles in the
English countryside, Poland, etc. The point is to synthesize the
partial truths of Brenner (& Co.) & Eric Williams (& Co.), which I
think constitutes a properly knowing return to Marx. One or the
other alone won't do.
((((((((((((
CB: Yes. Jim Blaut seems to think that Brenner was polemicizing against
emphasis on
national liberation movements at the time.
((((((((((
In fact, Brenner, properly read, is a friend of your thesis on the
revolution (recall your debate with Andy Austin, etc. on Lou's list),
against the empiricist inability to grasp the meanings of revolutions
_& counter-revolutions_ (within empiricist discourse, "The feudalist
mode of production just sort of slipped away smoothly without any
revolution," as you noted on Lou's list). Empiricism is an enemy of
historical materialism.
(((((((((
CB: As Lenin said, without revolutionary theory, there is no revolutionary
movement.
((((((((((
Admire Brenner (and Ellen Wood, Aijaz Ahmad, etc.) but scorn Laclau,
Genovese, Fogel & Engerman, etc.; treasure Eric Williams (and C. L.
R. James, Jim Blaut, Samir Amin, etc.) but forget Wallerstein, Andre
Gunder Frank, Fernand Braudel, etc. No one scholar can be wholly
correct, is what dialectics teaches us; at the same time, we should
avoid empiricism, whose chief error is *inability to see the forest
for the trees*.
(And keep Alan Carling's "Analytical Marxism and Historical
Materialism: The Debate on Social Evolution," _Science & Society_,
47.1, Spring 1993, pp. 31-65 in the _back_ [not the foreground] of
your mind, when you are not writing a political tract; in the
production of political tracts, however, _err_ on the side of
Brenner/Williams -- political Marxism's emphasis on class struggles.)
Yoshie
- Thread context:
- Re: Forwarded from Anthony (slavery), (continued)
- Forwarded from Anthony (reply to Jim F.),
Louis Proyect Sun 22 Oct 2000, 20:59 GMT
- Rationale for racism: Fogel and Engerman,
Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Sun 22 Oct 2000, 18:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:3388] Re: Brenner Redux (was Re: Russell R. Menard onEric Williams),
Charles Brown Sun 22 Oct 2000, 18:22 GMT
- National democratic revolution (was Re: The French/Haitian Revolutions & the American Civil War (was Re: Debating slavery: Marx,
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky Sun 22 Oct 2000, 18:10 GMT
- Knowledge Management and elists,
Doyle Saylor Sun 22 Oct 2000, 17:00 GMT
- Seven steps to peace,
Charles Brown Sun 22 Oct 2000, 15:25 GMT
- The French/Haitian Revolutions & the American Civil War (was Re:Debating slavery: Marx's discussion),
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 22 Oct 2000, 15:18 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]