Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: English and French revolutions
The idiosyncracies of time & place are the bread & butter of
professional historians. Yes they were different but there were
similarities between the three revolutions that James mentioned, the
English, French, and Russian, respectively. The Puritans did assault the
Church of England, and they did decapitate the monarch. Invocations to
one's common fellows became more universal as the revolutions proceeded
in their respective epochs, i.e., English to fellow Englishmen, French
to fellow men, Russian to fellow humans. In all there was a swing back
of the pendulum, and a clogging of democratic process in pettifoggery
(reactionary bureaucratism, etc.). We can only prepare for the future
revolution by studying past revolutions, and maybe we can find a way
to secure the benefits of a world "in which the free development of each
is the condition for the free development of all."
YFTR,
Chris Brady
- Thread context:
- Re: Forwarded from AIDOH, (continued)
- [L-I] State of World Population 2000,
Johannes Schneider Thu 21 Sep 2000, 18:19 GMT
- Review of de Soto's Mystery of Capital,
Hylton White Thu 21 Sep 2000, 17:49 GMT
- Re: English and French revolutions,
Julio Pino Thu 21 Sep 2000, 17:41 GMT
- Invitation Liberation of Kuwait : X Anniversary,
Julio Pino Thu 21 Sep 2000, 17:29 GMT
- Pacifica and the Internet,
Louis Proyect Thu 21 Sep 2000, 14:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]