Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?
- Subject: Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?
- From: Yoshie Furuhashi <furuhashi.1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 11:02:53 -0700
Doyle:
>how does
>one make a distinction then about sex work on class levels as you imply with
>regard to what we want and don't want in a social system?
In an analysis of prostitution, one can easily see the working
conditions of self-employed adult prostitutes who cater to very rich
clientele are very different from those of child prostitutes sold by
parents into debt bondage & prostitution (and there are many
gradations in-between). Just as the working conditions of generals
are different from those of grunts.
>If one steals to
>make a living, for example a high class jewel thief, do we then want to
>decriminalize jewel stealing?
Vice crimes -- such as drug use, prostitution, etc. -- can be
decriminalized even under capitalism, as they have been in some
countries. Decriminalization at least makes prostitutes safer from
arbitrary raids & brutalities inflicted by cops. Also, in countries
in which prostitution is criminalized, cops often make a business of
extorting money from prostitutes. One wants to stop that.
>What is the work that sex performs in creating relationships? Does the
>prostitute really do the same kind of work as a sex partner? Where the
>partners in a really existing sexual relationship are same sex who is the
>prostitute and who is the John?
Under capitalism, there can't be very good relationships -- even
under the best of the circumstances -- between service workers (of
any kind) and customers.
>A prostitute provides sex without regard to building other kinds of social
>relationships.
You mean prostitutes don't have families, friends, & other personal
relationships outside work??? If you mean ostracism, that's the
fault of hypocritical society.
>I would guess that the fetish of whipping someone is a product of compulsive
>cognition. Is that really serving the needs of the disability involved?
>Put in a more common context, does smoking cigarettes serve the needs of
>people who are compulsive smokers? Is that necessarily a moral question? I
>would say it is not a moral question about smoking because the health risks
>involved need to be addressed over whether or not something is "bad". In
>fact public health often clashes over morality, since libertarianism wants
>to make a smoker safe from prohibition and government regulation.
Health risks should be considered, but outlawing cigars might create
some problem for Cuban Socialism (Fidel has quit smoking, though). :)
Are Cubans libertarian because they make & smoke cigars?
Some prostitutes serve the sexual needs of the disabled who have
disposable incomes.
>But people who do reject smoking then go through a process of creating an
>understanding about smoking in which they "feel" they don't want to do
>something. A value system is typically how people try to express that
>without resorting to calling that a moral system.
>
>The problem with that labeling is that it neglects what exactly goes on with
>developing a "feeling" as a really existing labor process in building social
>networks.
Feelings & moral values of sex workers -- which are diverse -- then
should be considered also, instead of citing an article that refers
to prostitutes as "these people" (objects of pity & contempt).
>You propose if we have a revolution that human beings who provide sex
>services would then be able to provide the labor without laws regulating
>those practices, except you see a need perhaps for compulsory STD exams.
Everyone must undergo compulsory STD exams, *if* they are indeed to
be instituted in the interest of public health. It is not as though
only female prostitutes have chances of getting STDs. Teenage
heterosexuals (non-prostitutes) are at a high risk. I don't know if
all of us want to do so very often, though. It's a balancing task
between public health & civil liberties.
As of now, the only attempt at "public health" has been set up to
protect johns from prostitutes, not vice versa.
>However, I see a clash in that between what people need in building social
>relationships, and providing food in a cafeteria, sex in a brothel,
>bathrooms in porta toilets.
I don't know what to say if you are also against cafeterias. :)
Yoshie
- Thread context:
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?, (continued)
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?,
Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Sun 17 Sep 2000, 12:24 GMT
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 17 Sep 2000, 13:58 GMT
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?,
Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Sun 17 Sep 2000, 15:24 GMT
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?,
Doyle Saylor Sun 17 Sep 2000, 16:33 GMT
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 17 Sep 2000, 18:02 GMT
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 17 Sep 2000, 19:09 GMT
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?,
L.Beaver & G.Harley Sun 17 Sep 2000, 19:10 GMT
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?,
Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Sun 17 Sep 2000, 19:55 GMT
- Re: SEXPLOITATION? What is at stake in Cuba?,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 17 Sep 2000, 20:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]