Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Marriage and prostitution
- Subject: Re: Marriage and prostitution
- From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 08:23:50 -0700
Louis Proyect wrote:
> >I'm really puzzled what your purpose is in posting this bit of fluff?
> >
> >Carrol
>
> Because the discussion has a history.
Then *show* that history. All your original post showed was that your
response to Doug undercuts everything you have ever written about
the organization of communist parties. The organizational structure
you propose will have to include *within the leadership* men and women
whose political views are more sharply distinct than yours and Doug's.
But since whenever Doug is involved you lose all your political sense,
it would seem your theory of the party is impossible.
And now back to your post. It shows no history whatever, and it has
no contribution to make to establishing a context for the present
discussion.
If the choice is between writers who speak of "these people" and Susie
Bright, it is obvious that marxists must side with Susie Bright.
Carrol
- Thread context:
- Re: Marriage and prostitution, (continued)
- Re: Marriage and prostitution,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 17 Sep 2000, 14:38 GMT
- Re: Marriage and prostitution,
Carrol Cox Sun 17 Sep 2000, 14:53 GMT
- Re: Marriage and prostitution,
Louis Proyect Sun 17 Sep 2000, 15:02 GMT
- Re: Marriage and prostitution,
Louis Proyect Sun 17 Sep 2000, 15:09 GMT
- Re: Marriage and prostitution,
Carrol Cox Sun 17 Sep 2000, 15:23 GMT
- Re: Marriage and prostitution,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 17 Sep 2000, 17:01 GMT
- Re: Marriage and prostitution,
Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Sun 17 Sep 2000, 19:13 GMT
- Re: Marriage and prostitution,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 17 Sep 2000, 19:55 GMT
- Re: Marriage and prostitution,
Luko Willms Sun 17 Sep 2000, 21:23 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]